January AWI Quarterly Published
AWI Mentioned in The Glass Hammer
March AWI Basics Seminars OAK, SAC & LA
Barbara Dalton is an attorney, licensed private investigator, and Vice President of Public Interest Investigations, Inc. She specializes in conducting neutral, third-party investigations into allegations of employment discrimination. She has supervised and conducted investigations of employee and employer misconduct, wage and hour violations, and wrongful termination claims. Prior to joining PII, Dalton was part of the team of attorneys who monitored Denny's restaurants for customer-based discrimination complaints. Denny's ultimately adopted the investigative model designed and used by Dalton and her colleagues during the monitoring period. Dalton also played an integral part in the creation and direction of an independently administered system of arbitration for Kaiser Permanente members throughout California. She served as an attorney with the HIV and AIDS Legal Services Alliance, where she assisted clients with matters involving discrimination, confidentiality, and health care access, and conducted trainings on those topics.
Attorneys Conducting Workplace Investigations: Navigating the Perils of PrivilegeRegister by February 14, 2012 to View Live February 14, 2012 1-2:30 pm and/or Recorded Through December 31, 2012Co-Sponsored by the State Bar of California Labor & Employment Law Section. 1.5 Hours MCLE Credit Approved. HRCI Credit Pending.Presented by Lindsay Harris and Mark TuftPrivilege issues loom large in internal investigations, yet all too often investigators and company counsel misunderstand this complex area of law. Through a series of dynamic hypotheticals, this Webinar will examine the key privilege issues affecting workplace investigations, with reference to the California Rules of Professional Conduct, the ABA Model Rules, federal and state rules of evidence, and leading court decisions. Co-sponsored by State Bar of California Labor & Employment Section. The Webinar will include a power point presentation covering the following topics: Elements of the attorney-client privilege under state and federal law Elements of the work product privilege under each Factors to consider in determining whether an investigation should be privileged and the role of the attorney-investigator in making the decision Are factual investigations subject to the attorney-client privilege?
Privilege implications of conducting and memorializing witness interviews and reporting the results of a workplace investigation (e.g., notes vs. witness statements vs. recordings) Privilege issue in interviewing officers and directors, supervisors and department heads, consultants and former employees Privilege issues following the investigation:
Privilege and ethical consideration where:
Specific ethics and other rules to be discussed include the following: California Business and Professions Code section 6068(e) and (m) California Evidence Code sections 250, 911-919, 950-958, 962 Federal Rules of Evidence 501, 502 California Rules of Professional Conduct 1-100, 2-100, 3-100, 3-110, 3-310, 3-400, 3-500, 3-600, 3-700, 5-210, 5-220 ABA Model Rules 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8(b), 1.8(f), 1.8(h), 1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.16, 2.3, 2.4, 3.7, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 Lindsay Harris brings considerable employment law and investigative experience to her current practice focused on conducting independent investigations of suspected workplace misconduct. Clients frequently turn to Ms. Harris for independent investigations involving high-level, complex, and sensitive matters. Mark L. Tuft is a litigation partner with Cooper, White & Cooper LLP in San Francisco. He serves as outside counsel to lawyers and law firms on professional responsibility, professional liability, law firm mergers and dissolutions and State Bar disciplinary matters. He also acts as an expert witness and consultant in these matters. |